Why the new Myers-Briggs shot is wholly meaningless

On dos mil some one carry it annually, at the behest away from corporate Hours departments, universities, and even bodies agencies. The company that renders and avenues the test makes to $20 million out-of it on a yearly basis.

«There’s only zero research about https://www.datingranking.net/fr/sites-de-rencontre-std they,» says Adam Offer, a business psychologist on University regarding Pennsylvania who’s discussing the latest shortcomings of the Myers-Briggs in earlier times. «The characteristics counted by sample provides little or no predictive strength about how delighted you will end up in a situation, how possible would at your employment, or how happier you’ll be on the relationships.»

The test says you to definitely centered on 93 questions, it does classification the individuals of the world for the 16 some other discrete «types» – and in this, act as «an effective construction having strengthening finest relationships, operating self-confident changes, harnessing invention, and having excellence.» All loyal consider it mostly as the a hack for suggesting their correct career choices.

Although test is made on 1940s in line with the entirely untested concepts away from Carl Jung that’s now carefully forgotten by the therapy area . Actually Jung informed you to definitely their identity «types» had been merely rough tendencies he’d observed, rather than rigid classifications. Multiple analyses demonstrated the exam is completely useless during the forecasting people’s achievements in numerous work, which approximately half of those who take it double rating additional show anytime.

Yet you could have heard anyone telling you that they’re a keen ENFJ (extroverted intuitive feeling judging), an enthusiastic INTP (introverted intuitive thinking seeing), or any other one of several 16 systems taken from Jung’s works, and have even started with all this take to in the a professional means. We have found a reason out-of these particular labels are incredibly meaningless – and just why zero organization about 21st 100 years is to trust the test to have something.

The fresh Myers-Briggs rests on completely unproven theories

Into the 1921, Jung blogged the book Mental Designs. Inside, he put forth several more fascinating, unsupported theories exactly how your mind works.

As to the reasons the new Myers-Briggs shot is totally meaningless

Among other things, the guy informed me one to individuals around end up in a couple chief models: perceivers and you can judgers. The previous class might be next split into those who choose feeling while some just who favor intuiting, since the latter was divided into thinkers and you can feelers, having all in all, five sorts of anyone. All models, likewise, would-be split up centered on thinking for the introverts and you may extroverts . Such kinds, even if, was in fact estimate: «Every individual is an exclusion to the rule,» Jung had written .

Also these types of crude groups, regardless if, don’t come out of regulated tests or research. «This is before therapy was an enthusiastic empirical research,» says Grant, this new Penn psychologist. «Jung actually generated this type of upwards based on their own feel.» However, Jung’s influence on the early career was astounding, which concept of «types» in particular caught into the.

Jung’s prices were afterwards adjusted toward a test of the Katherine Briggs and her dericans who’d no official learning psychology. To know the strategy out-of take to-and make and you may statistical study, Briggs worked with Edward Hay, an Hours manager to own a good Philadelphia bank.

They first started assessment the «Style of Sign» from inside the 1942. It duplicated Jung’s models however, slightly changed the fresh new words, and you can altered they making sure that citizens were assigned one to chance otherwise the other in all five classes, centered on its ways to several one or two-options inquiries.

Improve one or two (just how many choice inside the for each group) towards the last power (what amount of groups) therefore score sixteen: different types of someone there seem to have the world. Myers and Briggs provided headings to every of them versions, for instance the Government, the fresh new Caregiver, this new Researcher, therefore the Idealist.

Deja una respuesta